Discussion Forum - Northstar Chevelle Club

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
NCC Forum Home Page -> NCC - Craigslist & Ebay -> Anyone need a FREE 68-72 8.2" 10 bolt rear end?
Post Info TOPIC: Anyone need a FREE 68-72 8.2" 10 bolt rear end?
SShink


3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4771
Date:
Anyone need a FREE 68-72 8.2" 10 bolt rear end?
Permalink  
 

http://minneapolis.craigslist.org/dak/pts/4632565822.html

Sounds like it's near my place if you are interested.  Looks like an 8.2 from the diff housing not having the square ends to it.

image 1

image 2



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

2001 Mustang GT Convertible 

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 
Derek69SS


Founding Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 2786
Date:
Permalink  
 

It's not a Chevy 8.2... must be BOP as it doesn't have the stamped upside-down "V" in the cover to direct oil to the outer bearings.

__________________

Derek Kiefer - Mantorville, MN

69 Malibu Pro-Touring stroker LS1-383/T56 - 69 SS396-325/3spd project
Lost in the 60s


President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7334
Date:
Permalink  
 

Derek69SS wrote:

It's not a Chevy 8.2... must be BOP as it doesn't have the stamped upside-down "V" in the cover to direct oil to the outer bearings.

 Yep, it's a BOP and it's GONE...



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS/RS 350 M20
SShink


3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4771
Date:
Permalink  
 

Are you guys sure about it not being an 8.2"?  This looks exactly like the 8.2 that was in my 71 Malibu.  It didn't have the V cover on it, and that car was completely original.  Maybe they ran out of Chevy 10 bolts and subbed in a BOP when the car was built?



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

2001 Mustang GT Convertible 

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 
Lost in the 60s


President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7334
Date:
Permalink  
 

SShink wrote:

Are you guys sure about it not being an 8.2"?  This looks exactly like the 8.2 that was in my 71 Malibu.  It didn't have the V cover on it, and that car was completely original.  Maybe they ran out of Chevy 10 bolts and subbed in a BOP when the car was built?

 Yes, it is an 8.2 but not a Chevy. BOPs had the round cover and generally used a cone clutch system with 2 piece carrier for the posi. They also stayed with bolt in axles, where Chevy went the notorious c-clip route.



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS/RS 350 M20
SShink


3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4771
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lost in the 60s wrote:

 BOPs had the round cover and generally used a cone clutch system with 2 piece carrier for the posi. They also stayed with bolt in axles, where Chevy went the notorious c-clip route.

Yep, that's what's under my vert.  Got it from Chris P. and rebuilt by Steve S. since it was stronger and a better gear ratio with posi than the 8.2 Chevy 10 bolt that was original to the car.



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

2001 Mustang GT Convertible 

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 
Lost in the 60s


President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7334
Date:
Permalink  
 

SShink wrote:
Lost in the 60s wrote:

 BOPs had the round cover and generally used a cone clutch system with 2 piece carrier for the posi. They also stayed with bolt in axles, where Chevy went the notorious c-clip route.

Yep, that's what's under my vert.  Got it from Chris P. and rebuilt by Steve S. since it was stronger and a better gear ratio with posi than the 8.2 Chevy 10 bolt that was original to the car.

 I thought yours was an 8.5 Buick 10 bolt ???



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

Some Assembly Required

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS/RS 350 M20
SShink


3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4771
Date:
Permalink  
 

Lost in the 60s wrote:

Lost in the 60s wrote:

 BOPs had the round cover and generally used a cone clutch system with 2 piece carrier for the posi. They also stayed with bolt in axles, where Chevy went the notorious c-clip route.

Yep, that's what's under my vert.  Got it from Chris P. and rebuilt by Steve S. since it was stronger and a better gear ratio with posi than the 8.2 Chevy 10 bolt that was original to the car.

 I thought yours was an 8.5 Buick 10 bolt ???

 I was referring to the BOP style features, and yes it's an 8.5.



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

2001 Mustang GT Convertible 

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
NCC Forum Home Page -> NCC - Craigslist & Ebay -> Anyone need a FREE 68-72 8.2" 10 bolt rear end?
Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!