Discussion Forum - Northstar Chevelle Club

Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Final 350 I am working on.


1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1724
Date:
Final 350 I am working on.
Permalink  
 


My latest engine project. Going to dyno it on Sunday so will have some numbers to post. Hoping to be in the 430-450 horse range and 400+ torque.

Specs:

Later model 350 4 bolt main roller block still standard bore

Gm fastburn aluminum heads with valve sping upgrade otherwise box stock

Speedpro Hyper pistons with two valve relief compression comes in about 10.2-1, balanced rotating assembly

Howards roller camshaft 225/225 525/525 on 110 LSA. Using 1.6 rockers so is actually 560 lift

Weiend air gap dual plane intake

Quick fuel 750 slayer carb

 



__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



3K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 4731
Date:
Permalink  
 

After what you did with mine, I'd say the torque will be 450+ since mine did 411 ft. lbs..  thumbsup

 



__________________

Stan S.-Twin Cities 'South Metro'

1972 Malibu Convertible 2nd time around 

2001 Mustang GT Convertible 

Forum influenced terms: 'Link Paste', 'Stanitized', & 'Revolving garage door...' 

 



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1724
Date:
Permalink  
 

bobs engine.JPG

If it made 450 horse and 450 torque that would make me pretty happy.



Attachments
__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



Secretary

Status: Offline
Posts: 2941
Date:
Permalink  
 

451/471

__________________

Bryan-NW 'burbs
1972 Malibu
Vaguely stock appearing, and the opposite of restored.
1999 std bore 5.7, Vortec heads, Holley Stealth Ram, GM cam
700R4, Viking coilovers, 12 bolt 4.10 posi, and a whole bunch more



President

Status: Offline
Posts: 7328
Date:
Permalink  
 

I would think 450 torque is a given with those flamed valve covers....nana



__________________

Mitch D.   River Falls, WI

Lifetime member of the "Cars apart Club"

1966 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1970 Chevelle SS 396 M20

1967 Camaro SS/RS 350 M20



2K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 2444
Date:
Permalink  
 

Nice numbers Chris. What's it going to go into?


"Final 350 I am working on."   But not the last one?
 
 





__________________

Kevin

Northwestern Ohio



Mega Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 713
Date:
Permalink  
 

Going to guess at 425hp, 460 ft-lbs torque with a good carb.

__________________

John E - Rogers, MN

Instructions? All I need is the exploded view.
70 El Camino soon to be ls1/t56
64 Malibu SS



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1724
Date:
Permalink  
 

dashboard wrote:

Nice numbers Chris. What's it going to go into?


"Final 350 I am working on."   But not the last one?
 
 




 It is going into a 1965 Chevrolet pickup truck.

just last one for this year anyway but not the last one ever.



__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1724
Date:
Permalink  
 

Tried to build this motor like the zz430 motor gm built. This has slightly bigger cam, better intake, and comparable carb. So will see what happens.



__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1724
Date:
Permalink  
 

Disappointing day at the dyno. Only made 380 horse and 400 torque. I am totally baffled to say the least. To much cam or to much head I don't know. Almost wish I had not gone to the dyno and just believed.headscratch



__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



Secretary

Status: Offline
Posts: 2941
Date:
Permalink  
 

I think it's the "port velocity" we were talking about yesterday. Over the RPM range, did it pick up or fall off more at higher RPMs? I think "too large" of a port would show itself on the lower RPMs and come into it's own at higher where the air speed through them picks up. Too large of a port doesn't help channel all that air out which affects how much air is drawn in which means the carb is under delivering based on the signal from the engine.


Short of a head swap to the other ones you were talking about (and more dyno time), maybe install it and butt dyno, then swap to 1.5 rockers and see if it butt dyno's better?

the other thing you mentioned: correction factors are different with different dynos could also come into play, though I'm sure that if Ron trusts it, it's good.



__________________

Bryan-NW 'burbs
1972 Malibu
Vaguely stock appearing, and the opposite of restored.
1999 std bore 5.7, Vortec heads, Holley Stealth Ram, GM cam
700R4, Viking coilovers, 12 bolt 4.10 posi, and a whole bunch more



Mega Poster

Status: Offline
Posts: 713
Date:
Permalink  
 

What is the casting number of the heads?

Flattop pistons?

Piston to deck distance?, Quench height? Intake manifold misaligned or needs to be port matched?

After reading the article below, the numbers are pretty close.  What rpm did you stop pulling at?  The runners are big, so it going be lazy for awhile unless you really plan on winding it up.

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/hrdp_9902_gm_small_block_cylinder_heads/



__________________

John E - Rogers, MN

Instructions? All I need is the exploded view.
70 El Camino soon to be ls1/t56
64 Malibu SS



1K+ Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 1724
Date:
Permalink  
 

Enganeer wrote:

What is the casting number of the heads?

Flattop pistons?

Piston to deck distance?, Quench height? Intake manifold misaligned or needs to be port matched?

After reading the article below, the numbers are pretty close.  What rpm did you stop pulling at?  The runners are big, so it going be lazy for awhile unless you really plan on winding it up.

http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/engine/hrdp_9902_gm_small_block_cylinder_heads/


 I don't remember the casting number of the heads but is it the ones in the article you linked to. Yes I know the big port will affect the low end torque though it really did not in that article but it still should make the same power at the top end. The motor is 0 decked with flat top two valve relief pistons and gasket thickness is 0.39 so it has quench. We pulled it to 6000 rpm and it was making peak power about 5700-5800 and peak torque around 4100-4200. All ports line up correctly I used a vortec style intake to match the taller port of those heads.

It should match this very closely http://paceperformance.com/i-5146502-gmp-12496430-1-gm-zz430-chevy-350cid-430hp-crate-engine.html and the motor made its peak numbers close to what there chart shows. I think I am going to take it to a diffferent dyno and check it again. But I am going to check compression on all cylinders and degree the cam one more time to make sure of things.

 



__________________

Chris P
East Central, Mn

66 Chevelle 300 deluxe



Secretary

Status: Offline
Posts: 2941
Date:
Permalink  
 

...and bring a set of 1.5 rockers...?

__________________

Bryan-NW 'burbs
1972 Malibu
Vaguely stock appearing, and the opposite of restored.
1999 std bore 5.7, Vortec heads, Holley Stealth Ram, GM cam
700R4, Viking coilovers, 12 bolt 4.10 posi, and a whole bunch more

Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Chatbox
Please log in to join the chat!